|
Back to News
Data do not support ban on silicone breast implants
By Sally Satel, USA Today,
4/10/05
Ever since women began enlarging their breasts with implants,
feminists have been upset. So, predictably, when a Food and Drug
Administration advisory panel
begins hearings today to consider approval of silicone-gel-filled breast
implants, feminist health activists will urge them to reject the
devices as unsafe. But
the data emphatically do not justify their concern.
| The objections of feminists are driven by body politics that
say that women should not alter their bodies to please men.
Apparently, a woman has the right to choose what she does to
her body as long as she chooses the right thing. |
Unfortunately, women can't depend on such groups as the National
Organization for Women to give them the facts. It is 13 years since
FDA imposed a voluntary
moratorium on silicone implants, motivated by case reports that they caused
connective tissue diseases (e.g., lupus, scleroderma). Within a few months,
the ban was partly lifted so women could get implants after a mastectomy
if they agreed to be tracked by the FDA.
To date, at least 20 studies show no evidence that implants, broken
or intact, cause connective tissue diseases. Many of these studies
included women
followed for an average of a decade or more after getting implants.
No rigorous study
has shown evidence of disease. Still, feminist groups keep pumping out
the misinformation.
In a letter regarding the FDA hearings
sent to Rep. Nathan Deal, chairman of the health subcommittee
of the House Energy and Commerce
Committee, groups
including Feminist Majority, National Women's Health Network and the
National Council of Women's Organizations insisted that rupture
and silicone leakage
can lead to "serious health problems." Their fears are based solely
on anecdotes.
True, no device lasts forever. Data from the sole examination
of rupture-incidence rates, published in 2003 in Archives of Surgery,
indicate that about 20% of modern implants rupture within 10 years
of cosmetic augmentation. Even so, there is no greater incidence
of connective tissue disease in women with ruptured implants than
those without implants, according to exhaustive analyses from the
Institute of Medicine (1999), the U.K. Independent Review Panel
on Silicone Gel Breast Implants (1998) and the National Cancer
Institute (2004).
Last July, the journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery published
a study that for the first time tracked women whose implants had
already
ruptured, and then assessed them two years later. After monitoring
64 Danish women with at least one ruptured implant, the authors
found no change in immunologic markers (indicators of connective
tissue disease).
What's more, the popular implants today
in Europe and South America are the "third generation" devices. They have sturdy silicone gel — imagine thick, clear gelatin — that
typically keeps its shape even if torn. Fourth-generation devices,
likened to gummy bears, are in the approval pipeline at the FDA
and are in use in many developed
countries, but not in the USA or Canada.
What about detection of breast cancer? The women's groups say
implants interfere with mammogram results. This is a dangerous
half-truth. Yes, implants often decrease
visibility of breast tissue on mammography (to compensate, radiologists
use a positioning technique to get better views), but the critical
question is whether
this delays diagnosis. Here, the consensus is strong that women
with implants who develop cancer are not diagnosed at later stages
than women in the general
population. Survival of implanted women with cancer is the same
as cancer patients without implants.
The time is right for the FDA to grant approval of silicone implants
for cosmetic use. A reasonable approach would be for the agency
to stipulate
that augmented women become part of active post-marketing surveillance.
The ample data about
rupture rates and well-replicated inability to find a link between
implants and systemic disease suggest acceptable risk for informed
consumers.
The objections of feminists are driven by body politics that say
that women should not alter their bodies to please men. Apparently,
a woman has
the right to choose what she does to her body as long as she
chooses the right thing.
back
|